Ford Ranger Wildtrak X v Mitsubishi L200 SVP 2

The Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVPII and Ford Ranger Wildtrak X were two of the most exciting exhibits at the 2018 CV Show; so exciting that we decided to give them their very own head-to-head. We tested both alongside each other, on and off the road, to discover which beast is best!

Both models are limited editions; the SVP 2 to just 250 models and the Wildtrak X to 1,000. The Wildtrak X changes consist are fairly modest compared to SVP 2, which has been developed by Mitsubishi’s newly-created ‘Special Vehicle Projects’ division.

Looks and appearance

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II

Ford Ranger Wildtrak X

Ford Ranger Wildtrak X

The wide-ranging modifications to the L200 SVP 2 make it stand out more than the Wildtrak X when we were out and about. The extended wheel-arches, orange detailing on the bumper, alloys and handles, combined with the BF Goodrich AT tyres of the SVP 2 turned far more heads than the glossy black grille and ‘Performance Blue’ colour scheme of the Wildtrak X.

Both models are based on the top trim levels, and so benefit from a high-level of spec. The SVP 2 features electrically-folding and heated door mirrors, Bi-Xenon headlights and front and rear fog lights as standard, while the Ranger just has standard halogen lights and front fog lights, but there is a standard ‘Mountain Top’ tonneau cover.

Interior

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II interior

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II interior

Ford Ranger Wildtrak X interior

Ford Ranger Wildtrak X interior

On the inside, it’s a similar story with the L200’s orange interior lights and orange stitching in the seats creating a more distinctive feel, while – apart from the leather seats – there’s very little variation between the interior of the Wildtrak X and the standard Wildtrak.

Other standard features on the L200 SVP II include the very comfortable ‘six-pack’ leather seats with that model’s individual limited-edition number, keyless entry and start, a 7-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and satellite navigation, while the Ranger boasts a slightly larger 8-inch display which also includes Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and satellite navigation. Other standard features on both models include:

  • Rear parking camera
  • Climate control
  • Cruise control
  • Electric 8-way adjustable seats
  • Front parking sensors

Ford Ranger v Mitsubishi L200 on-road

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian v Ford Ranger Wildtrak

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian v Ford Ranger Wildtrak

Under the bonnet of the Wildtrak X is the veteran 3.2-litre, five pot Duratorq engine, producing up to 197bhp (3,000rpm) and 470Nm (1,500 to 2,750rpm), while the L200 is powered by the newer and smaller 2.4-litre MIVEC engine, capable of 178bhp (3,500rpm) and 430Nm (2,500rpm). The Wildtrak X is only available with a 6-speed automatic, while there is a choice between a 6-speed manual or 5-speed auto on the SVP 2.

Despite the heavier chassis, the Ford Ranger comfortably beats the L200 to 62mph (10.6 seconds v 11.8 seconds), although this is also partly down to the slow gear changes on the older 5-speed automatic on the L200 (manual versions are much faster).

Apart from the noisier engine and increased road noise, the Wildtrak X comes out on top for driving characteristics. The engine and transmission are more responsive, the steering feels more connected and there’s less body roll going into the bends. The L200, however, offers better manoeuvrability with a 5.9 metre turning circle and a more commanding view of the road ahead from the driver’s seat.

Ford Ranger v Mitsubishi L200 off-road

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II

Ford Ranger Wildtrak X alloys

Ford Ranger Wildtrak X alloys

Off the road, however, and it’s a different story. The Mitsubishi L200 definitely came out on top on the difficult terrain thanks to longer axle articulation, greater approach angle and responsive 4WD system (Super Select 2 with locking centre diff as standard).

While the Ranger has the greater approach angle and wading depth, the L200 felt more capable thanks to the lighter chassis (over 250kg difference between the two), tighter turning circle, shorter wheelbase and BF Goodrich AT tyres.

Loading and towing

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II load area

Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II load area

Ford Ranger load area

Ford Ranger load area

Few people will be grafting in these vehicles, but just in case you are the L200 SVP 2 has the better payload (1,050kg v 1,002kg) and both have the same industry-leading towing capacity of 3.5 tonnes. The Ranger can accommodate larger items, with the load area measuring 1,549mm long (1,520mm on the L200) by 1,560mm wide (1,470mm) and 511mm high side walls (475mm) and 1,139mm (1,080mm) between the wheelarches.

The load area lining is standard on both models and the SVP II’s load area is illuminated in distinctive orange lighting, although its Mountain Top roll cover is only an option (standard on the Wildtrak X).

Cost of ownership

The SVP II and Wildtrak X are similarly priced at £29,830 and £30,945 (both excluding VAT) respectively. The Mitsubishi boasts the longer warranty (5-year, 62,500 miles against 3-year, 60,000 miles), better reliability (see the 2017 Pickup Reliability Survey results) and better fuel economy (39.8mpg against 32.1mpg).

Service intervals are longer on the Ranger (1-year, 20,000 miles against 1-year 12,500 miles), as are the residual values.  

Ford Ranger v Mitsubishi L200 Verdict

We’ve decided to give this one to the Mitsubishi L200 Barbarian SVP II. Its outlandish looks turned a lot of heads and created a mixed response at Professional Pickup HQ, but it certainly became more palatable with time. The attention to detail, like the orange lighting in the cab and load area, makes the Wildtrak X alterations look rather subtle.

While the Ranger is more practical and has better road manners, the L200 has a better spec, is cheaper to run, has a more limited production run, is better off-road and is cheaper to buy.

ALSO READ: Mitsubishi L200 v Nissan Navara

ALSO READ: Ford Ranger v Toyota Hilux

Ford Ranger Wildtrak X v Mitsubishi L200 SVP 2

About The Author
- Liam Campbell is an award-winning journalist with a Masters degree in Automotive Journalism from Coventry University. Growing up on a farm and learning to drive in a Mark 1 Range Rover (his left thigh is still twice as big as his right), Liam likes to think he knows a thing or two about commercial 4x4s. Previously, he was the Van Editor at Parkers and resident pickup expert at Car Magazine, before taking up the post of Editor at Professional Pickup & 4x4. Follow him on Twitter https://twitter.com/maxximum_load

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>